Sunday, November 21, 2010

Jodie Foster, in Nell
approximately 48 minutes and 41 seconds
46.7% of the film

The film

It tells the story of an adult woman who has to face other people for the first time after being raised by her mother in an isolated cabin.

You can read my short review of the film just by clicking HERE.

Nell is a good film but, like many other ok films, it loses a lot when the plot turns commercially. All the scenes with Jodie in them are beautifully done, but I cared less about the other characters and unfortunately we see a lot of them. And I must point out the beautiful original score.

Jodie Foster as Nell

I don’t think I’ve ever had so much prejudice going into a performance like I did with this one. I expected the worst overacting because of the nature of the role and because so many other bloggers hate it or make fun of it. I expected to give my first one-star rating, but I was completely taken over scene by scene. Almost anyone else would’ve failed miserably in this role, because it’s such a challenge to make it believable: but Jodie succeeds because she realizes that less is more.

Jodie plays Nell, a wild child: a mature woman who grew up in a cabin in the woods just with her mother and her twin sister who died when she was a child. She speaks a language of her own that’s hard to understand and knows nothing of the outside world. When her mother dies, Nell is discovered by a kind doctor who tries to protect her and decide what’s in her best interest.

It’s definitely not the typical Best Actress role and we have seen similar characters in regular movies that were disastrously portrayed. Nell is not a character mentally challenged and her behaviour is somewhat close to a person with autism – because she lives in her own world and at first has no desire to connect with elements outside her comfort zone. Though I had doubts she’ll nail it at first, as the role became more emotional I was completely charmed.

First there’s the physical aspect of the role and Jodie is just perfectly cast: her body type, her thinness, the certain stiffness of her movements, that touch of masculinity, the ability of looking humble and unpretentious and, most of all, those eyes… Jodie delivers Nell’s language as well as any other great actress would’ve manage to, but the key of the performance is the expressivity of her blue eyes and how much she can tell you just with one look or facial expression.

I’ve said that the beginning of the performance is a bit shaky because there’s a lot of screaming and there’s still a wall separating the viewer from the character’s feelings. As the story progresses we get used to her way of speaking and we see the emotional vulnerability of the character, but also her childish joy for life and her heart-warming excitement towards new discoveries.

Jodie’s acting in some of the scenes really did it for me: Nell’s first visit in town is played perfectly and the barroom scene is both believable and emotionally charged. She always understands the character and, especially in the second part, I was always convinced by her acting. It feels like a performance that required studying and training, but except for some minor slips it ends up looking as natural and as believable as it could be for such a character.

It’s a performance both simple and incredibly complex. The complexity comes from the emotional layers that Jodie has to show us using such unconventional means; the simplicity is all about how natural it gets to feel and how raw (and maybe familiar) the character’s emotions are. What convinced me of its greatness is not a big screaming scene, but the last 1 or 2 minutes of the film. There is so much love, but also pain and regret in her eyes while looking at the young girl; and that took me by surprise, it provoked me, it made me sad, I felt I GOT IT and I’m still thinking about it. The performance is a to say the least.


Fritz said...

I totally understand what you mean when you say that you expected the worse of this performance. I had the same feelings but ended up being rather pleasently surprised, but still much, much less than you.

joe burns said...

I didn't expect a four for her, but it's interesting you like her..

My predictions for your rankikng are:

1. Foster

2. Sarandon

3. Ryder

4. Lange

5. Richardson

dinasztie said...

I did expect her to become your pick after I read your review of the movie. I think your ranking will be like:

Malcolm said...

I have at least anticipated that you will give her a higher grade.

She was just great in the movie.

The race may turn out to be:

1. Foster
2. Sarandon
3. Lange
4. Ryder
5. Richardson

Anonymous said...

I can only applaud you for your ranking of foster(should've won oscar,deservedly won sag),judy holiday(for me even better than davis) and gloria swanson(great but slightly overrated).Sometimes i disagree with you(diane keaton in annie hall),but you are not under the influence of others.I admire you for that.

Beaudon Spaulding said...


I saw your blog and wanted to open a dialog with you about options of syndication. We are actively syndicating blog content across hundreds of thousands of domains. You would be placed in conjunction with our AP News content.
The service is free, takes under a minute to register and will provide exposure by way of page views to your blog content.
Please let me know if this is of interest.


Beaudon Spaulding

Alex in Movieland said...

@fritz, joe, dinasztie

yes, she really made an impact...
It's partly why I love doing this, because once in a while I am just SO surprised!

how could you have anticipated it? :P

I never said Diane Keaton is not great in Annie Hall! It just happened that I thought Marsha Mason and Jane Fonda were slightly better in their films or had a more complex role.
It doesn't get more adorable than Marsha in The Goodbye Girl and Jane Fonda's 90 minutes performance in Julia is probably her best; that scene in the bar with Vanessa Redgrave + the ending are pure acting magic.


thanks for the invite, but I don't want to add other links and images on my blog design...

Malcolm said...

When you reviewed the film in your other blog, and I read your comments about her, I was just sure that she's going to have a higher rating, if not the 5 stars.

Anonymous said...

This will be a terrific web page, might you be interested in doing an interview regarding just how you created it? If so e-mail me!.

Anonymous said...

There is obviously a lot to know about this. I think you made some good points in Features also. Keep working ,great job!.

Alex in Movieland said...

anonymous, I don't know who you are. :) leave a name, next time!