Thursday, September 15, 2011

Meryl Streep, in Out of Africa
approximately 100 minutes and 51 seconds*
66.7% of the film

The film

In 20th century colonial Kenya, a Danish baroness/plantation owner has a passionate but ultimately doomed love affair with a free-sprited hunter.

You can read my short review of the film just by clicking HERE.

It’s a film I like, because it’s so pretty and relaxing, a simple but interesting story to watch. The actors are fine, the direction is beautiful, the cinematography is dreamy and the original score is perfection, magic to my ears. And what a start for the film… Memorable.

Meryl Streep as Baroness Karen von Blixen-Finecke

Meryl will benefit from a lot of things while I write this, mostly generosity, because how can one really resist her charms, even when she’s not even trying… I favour her because she’s probably in my Top 3 favorite actresses, because she is so impressive & intimidating in her Oscar record and because I like Out of Africa quite a lot. And look at the screentime, there’s plenty of Meryl in it, and even more than the numbers would suggest.

Meryl plays Baroness Karen Blixen, a Danish woman who impulsively marries a man she doesn’t love, for his title, to spite her lover & looking for an adventure. They settle in Africa just before WWI and they keep a farm. As she becomes more disappointed with the marriage, she starts an affair with a very free-spirited huntsman. The film is all about her, and while she doesn’t get to cry or scream, it’s quite an emotional role.

As I said, this is not a flashy role, even though there could’ve been opportunities. This might be because the film is so quiet, there’s a certain tranquillity to it, so any unexpected burst of tears & shouting would’ve damaged the balance. In many ways, I appreciate that, it’s like a small sacrifice Meryl has to do, settling for a less demanding, more subtle part. By keeping it natural and flowy, she makes it look so damn easy.

Thankfully, I’ve seen it 3 times now, and I could tell this wasn’t as plain as some might find it. I was ok with the accent and I admire Meryl’s love for the camera and the camera’s love for Meryl, how she gives the right look, the right expression, the right body movement at the right point. She’s delicate, feminine but strong in that feminist way, and as always gave me the impression of a deep understanding of the character.

She’s rarely been so beautiful in a mature way, and brings something warm and likeable to Karen, something any central character should have. And she manages to keep the likeability even in such scenes at the end where Karen is jealous and possessive. With the help of good a screenplay, she keeps it human, playing it in a subtle way, as if arguing in favour of her character’s constant need for possession and security.

It’s certainly not the most challenging role she’s ever had to play, but she is the one mostly carrying the film. While she rarely gets a more volcanic scene, she’s constantly great throughout, slowly building a character that’s both convincing & likeable, even when not hiding from showing us Karen’s flaws. It looks easy because it’s Meryl doing it, and good acting from Meryl definitely gets a from me.

***the screentime was difficult to count, because of the voice-overs and mostly because of shots from long distance, where I wasn’t sure if a body double was used. I expected more screentime, as she is in almost every scene; however, in dialogues, the camera is not always on her, which takes away from the overall screentime.


dinasztie said...

My Danish girl. Love Meryl here... :D

Anonymous said...

Best thing about this performance? The hats. =)

Andrew: Encore Entertainment said...

I like Meryl here too. It's an easy performance, and she'd probably rank #4 for me but I think the field is rather good. I'm looking forward to your thoughts on Jessica.

mrripley said...

I preferred her in plenty in 85,i find her film and performance one note and a bit flat,she gets drowned in the scenery and the glow of redfords smile and hair,i don't care for 85 apart from whoopi.

Cal said...

I think this performance mainly comes down to whether you buy the film or not. I didn't, but we knew you were going to love it again ;-)

Alex in Movieland said...

agreed. :)

not that flashy :) Milena Canonero could've (and probably did) designed this in her sleep.

I dunno about easy. It's eassier than Sophie for sure :D

haven't seen Plenty, though I remember people not liking it. Was that Nick Davis?

I agree that it's very connected to the film :D

Malcolm said...

I love her here, but mostly because this performance is both natural and beautiful.

It's not an extroverted character, but a woman who keeps almost everything inside her heart.

I think she's deserving to win, but I understand anyone who says Meryl could do this in her sleep. :)

Blogger said...

Did you know you can create short urls with Shortest and get money for every click on your shortened links.